Latest Info: Serena Williams’ former coach defends Jannik Sinner’s “promotion” during her doping ban.

Rennae Stubbs believes that the irritation caused by

Jannik Sinner’s appearance at a fashion exhibition in spite of his suspension from professional tennis was unwarranted.

Sinner’s tennis ban does not restrict him from going to non-tennis-related events.

After resolving his well-publicized doping scandal with the

World Anti-Doping Agency, he was prohibited until May 4.

Nearly a year has passed since Sinner’s two clostebol tests at the 2024 Indian Wells Open.

WADA challenged the ruling that cleared him, but ultimately made efforts to reach a

settlement instead of taking the matter to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

Some people are upset about the case settlement because they believe the ATP world

No. 1 was given preferential treatment over others, even though WADA acknowledged that

Sinner was a million miles away from doping after unintentionally becoming tainted.

Many people did not think well of the Italian’s participation as a guest of honour at the Gucci

Fashion Show because of the issue surrounding Sinner and his continued ban.

On X (previously Twitter), a user asked whether athletes like Simona Halep and Maria Sharapova,

who were also banned after testing positive for illegal substances,

were still receiving positive press from numerous media sites throughout their suspension.

In response to the user, Stubbs said that Sinner was serving a three-month penalty because

of the negligence of his fitness coach and physiotherapist at the time,

who contaminated him without his knowledge, and that WADA had exonerated him of any wrongdoing.

since “he” was exonerated of any wrongdoing. According to WADA,

his team’s inefficiency is the reason he is serving a ban.

The players named above were suspended in different ways.

The former doubles No. 1 and then answers a user’s subsequent reply.

She informed supporters that WADA and the International Tennis Integrity Agency acknowledged his innocence.

According to Stubbs, WADA offered a three-month punishment because it required some sort of victory.

He was exonerated and declared not at fault by both WADA and ITIA.

WADA was aware that they needed some kind of victory to ensure that players would not use that justification in the future.

I became tainted by “my team.” Although his team was the reason,

there was some ambiguity in this decision, but they required something.

That social media message demonstrates the range of criticism directed at WADA.

Many, including Toni Nadal, disagree that Sinner should be banned,

and those who do believe that WADA resolved the case to spare them the humiliation of losing a CAS appeal hearing.

Others, on the other hand,

believe Sinner was given preferential treatment and ought to have faced an appeal hearing.

The world No. 1 player Nick Kyrgios, who has been the most outspoken critic of the case since it was made public,

described the settlement as a sad day for tennis.

WADA may believe that the three-month punishment was appropriate because it received criticism from both sides.

In any event,

the intense emotions surrounding Sinner’s case are not going to go away anytime soon.